戴爾錯標!法官自稱「鄉民」 判免出貨 - 消費者保護
By Jack
at 2010-01-23T18:26
at 2010-01-23T18:26
Table of Contents
對於這件事
筆者有話要說
就是
本版的Alvitr
是這一個判決最早波出來的作者
之後才被轉文到八卦版 律師版等等
因為在本版之前就已經有其他判決的文章出現
但 都沒有記者抄
記者還以為這個判決是最早Dell的判決
所以合理的推斷
該報導記者沒有常駐本版 是從八卦版抄過去的
恩 無聊的觀察 請大家繼續批Dell
※ 引述《btfortaiwan (OOXX)》之銘言:
: 去年喧騰一時的戴爾電腦標錯價事件,當時戴爾不承認下單,拒絕出貨,有網友憤而提告
: ,如今判決出爐,判原告敗訴,法官在判決書裡頭,大剌剌承認自己也是鄉民,親眼見到
: 網友爭相轉告下單的「盛況」,法官就分析,多數網友可能抱持這樣的心態,就是明知道
: 戴爾不會履約,但還是可以賭一把,「因為賭輸了沒損失,賭贏了就賺到」,所以就算明
: 知判決出爐,會引來為虎作倀的批評,還是堅決要判網友敗訴。
: 原告之訴駁回,還得負擔1千元的訴訟費用,這個就是網友告戴爾詐欺的判決書,結果就
: 是戴爾不必出貨,法官署名林呈樵。
: 仔細一看,判決寫的還真白話,法官自稱也是網路「鄉民」,在網路發生標錯價時,曾親
: 身參與,親眼見到引發盛況,看見許多網友跟鄉民瘋狂下訂,還有戰況回報,抱著要給大
: 企業落井下石的得利心態。
: http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/100123/8/1zbae.html
: 無言了!!
--
筆者有話要說
就是
本版的Alvitr
是這一個判決最早波出來的作者
之後才被轉文到八卦版 律師版等等
因為在本版之前就已經有其他判決的文章出現
但 都沒有記者抄
記者還以為這個判決是最早Dell的判決
所以合理的推斷
該報導記者沒有常駐本版 是從八卦版抄過去的
恩 無聊的觀察 請大家繼續批Dell
※ 引述《btfortaiwan (OOXX)》之銘言:
: 去年喧騰一時的戴爾電腦標錯價事件,當時戴爾不承認下單,拒絕出貨,有網友憤而提告
: ,如今判決出爐,判原告敗訴,法官在判決書裡頭,大剌剌承認自己也是鄉民,親眼見到
: 網友爭相轉告下單的「盛況」,法官就分析,多數網友可能抱持這樣的心態,就是明知道
: 戴爾不會履約,但還是可以賭一把,「因為賭輸了沒損失,賭贏了就賺到」,所以就算明
: 知判決出爐,會引來為虎作倀的批評,還是堅決要判網友敗訴。
: 原告之訴駁回,還得負擔1千元的訴訟費用,這個就是網友告戴爾詐欺的判決書,結果就
: 是戴爾不必出貨,法官署名林呈樵。
: 仔細一看,判決寫的還真白話,法官自稱也是網路「鄉民」,在網路發生標錯價時,曾親
: 身參與,親眼見到引發盛況,看見許多網友跟鄉民瘋狂下訂,還有戰況回報,抱著要給大
: 企業落井下石的得利心態。
: http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/100123/8/1zbae.html
: 無言了!!
--
Tags:
消費者保護
All Comments
By Bethany
at 2010-01-27T12:48
at 2010-01-27T12:48
By Frederic
at 2010-01-31T00:04
at 2010-01-31T00:04
By Eartha
at 2010-02-03T00:59
at 2010-02-03T00:59
By Edwina
at 2010-02-03T22:25
at 2010-02-03T22:25
By Ingrid
at 2010-02-05T17:53
at 2010-02-05T17:53
By Robert
at 2010-02-08T01:00
at 2010-02-08T01:00
By Steve
at 2010-02-12T18:57
at 2010-02-12T18:57
By Lydia
at 2010-02-13T20:43
at 2010-02-13T20:43
By Frederica
at 2010-02-17T21:36
at 2010-02-17T21:36
By Elma
at 2010-02-22T15:45
at 2010-02-22T15:45
By John
at 2010-02-23T16:30
at 2010-02-23T16:30
By Rosalind
at 2010-02-24T07:24
at 2010-02-24T07:24
By Blanche
at 2010-02-25T05:37
at 2010-02-25T05:37
By Valerie
at 2010-03-01T14:04
at 2010-03-01T14:04
By Hedda
at 2010-03-02T08:39
at 2010-03-02T08:39
By Carolina Franco
at 2010-03-05T18:03
at 2010-03-05T18:03
By Odelette
at 2010-03-07T13:22
at 2010-03-07T13:22
By Carol
at 2010-03-08T16:31
at 2010-03-08T16:31
By David
at 2010-03-13T13:45
at 2010-03-13T13:45
By Vanessa
at 2010-03-17T22:26
at 2010-03-17T22:26
By Robert
at 2010-03-22T15:55
at 2010-03-22T15:55
By Aaliyah
at 2010-03-27T12:26
at 2010-03-27T12:26
By Robert
at 2010-03-28T12:49
at 2010-03-28T12:49
By Jessica
at 2010-03-31T11:47
at 2010-03-31T11:47
By Queena
at 2010-04-05T11:13
at 2010-04-05T11:13
By Lauren
at 2010-04-09T15:13
at 2010-04-09T15:13
By Rae
at 2010-04-13T00:13
at 2010-04-13T00:13
By Belly
at 2010-04-17T01:19
at 2010-04-17T01:19
By Isla
at 2010-04-20T01:20
at 2010-04-20T01:20
By Sandy
at 2010-04-24T17:45
at 2010-04-24T17:45
By Yedda
at 2010-04-28T15:43
at 2010-04-28T15:43
By Valerie
at 2010-04-28T18:11
at 2010-04-28T18:11
By Faithe
at 2010-04-30T06:28
at 2010-04-30T06:28
By Doris
at 2010-05-03T01:34
at 2010-05-03T01:34
Related Posts
By Bennie
at 2010-01-23T14:24
at 2010-01-23T14:24
產品保固
By Doris
at 2010-01-23T03:44
at 2010-01-23T03:44
產品保固
By Andy
at 2010-01-22T21:09
at 2010-01-22T21:09
dell判決出來了
By Lydia
at 2010-01-21T12:44
at 2010-01-21T12:44
合購商品出問題,求償責任歸屬?
By William
at 2010-01-21T11:47
at 2010-01-21T11:47